If you could change one thing in this world, what would it be?

[curl-6]

Netyaroze said:

curl-6 said:

One could ask where's the "fairness" in one species, humans,getting priority over thousands of others?

Of course we value our own kind over others, we're programmed to.

Honestly, things like humans repopulating species on other planets and such, that's all a bit far fetched and distant compared to the here-and-now reality of our destruction of thousands of species.

We haven't had priority in the past. 

Number of species is not even relevant we are all one in the end, the species classification is human made and you can't put a value on it anyway. 1000 species are not more worth than 1.

Nothing is fair in life and death thats my point, the human extinction would not be better for life. We are life we are part of nature who decides whats better ? Nobody does.

 

The destruction of species is bad because ? 

 

The repopulating life after disasters  (not necessarily on other planets) is just to show you the only objective metric that exist for life is survival and if Humans exists life has a theoretical chance of prolonged survival. So its objectively speaking "better" for life if humans continue to exist. 

Its infact not better for life if humans die in order to save animals. Its better for those animals only. 

1000 species do matter more than 1. Would you let one person kill 1000 others, when killing him could save them?

And you act as though no other intelligent beings capable of "saving" life could or do exist.