Battlefield 4 demo ran on an AMD Radeon HD 7990 ‘Malta’ Video Card

[Michael-5]

CGI-Quality said:

Michael-5 said:

What does that have to do with what I posted?

CGI-Quality said:

It's within the vein of 10-15%.

Do you mean 10-15x?

And how, please explain to me. Most of the upgrades to PS3 software ranges to 1.5-9x more powerful/capable, the only component which sees a greater then 9x boost is the RAM....wait....I looked it up PS4 only has 8GB of DDR5 RAM, not 16GB like you stated. So no single component of PS4 is over 9x as powerful as PS3. This means that PS4 is probably in the 7-9x more powerful then PS3 range, and that's not a big jump considering you need 4x the power of PS3 just to run PS3 games in 1080p.

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/148974-ps4-hardware-specs-analyzed-a-big-upgrade-but-ultimately-underwhelming

This is probably why I have not been amazed with the new Killzone...

Yes, I meant 10-15x. And, at this point, some of us have tried to explain it already, you're just getting to hung up on the numbers. Also, I never stated that the PS4 had 16GB of RAM, I said it jumped x 16 (do the math - 512MB x 16 = 8192MB, which would equate to 8GB). 

Factoring everything in, including T.Flops, PS4 is around 10-15x more powerful than PS3. Besides, a no-name site would be the last place I would trust, when developers, themselves, all praise the current PS4 hardware.

Oh, sorry I thought PS3 had 1GB of RAM, my bad.

Still the raw processing power, bandwidth, number of processors, etc....they all multiple to 9x more then the PS3 or less. Just because RAM is up 16x, that doesn't magically make the PS3 a 7-9x more powerful system to a 10-15x more powerful system. RAM just doesn't do that, all RAM will do is decrease load times (which were devestating on the PS3).

So explain to me why you think PS4 is 10x more more powerful then the PS3 despite all the components being less then 10x more powerful? Or am I missing something?