@spurgeonryan
Would you please explain what slightly comparing something is ?
Why would you slightly compare two cases that are totally different when you have better cases like GC N64 SNES which have much more in common with the Wii U than the Virtual Boy.
For every aspect in the Wii Us life there are much more similarities to other Nintendo Products. The Virtual Boy is an unique product which was so different to the rest that you really can't compare it to anything Wii U related without skipping multiple better examples. A comparison is only logical if there is a point where the similarities match better than other examples thats not the case with Wii U and Virtual Boy. So the comparison makes really no sense. Or show me one thing were the VB is a good comparison to Wii U and no other Nintendo product is closer to it.
It would be nice to see what makes you see a connection between VB and Wii U ? Other than that they are from Nintendo.
Edit: If you point to the thread each and every point has closer examples to the Wii U, than VB is. It plays in an entire different league so really VB could be compared to XB GC N64 too pretty much. But VB wasn't even on DC level it was really nothing that occured later. The points you made are general failures for not as succesful consoles. But the real reason why VB failed that hard is because the whole concept was broken. Wii U is nothing like that.
