By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ioi said:
rendo, I was considering that this morning and I think it will work better in cases where the average accuracy is lower so yes that is probably how I will modify the scoring and maybe have a 1.1 in there as well to basically reward people for entering:

Winnings = 1.1 * (1 + (your accuracy-average accuracy)/100) * bet

This way, you can earn between 0 and 2.2 times your original bet and you only need to be better than 9% below the average accuracy for a particular prediction to break even.

Sounds good... that's what i call a more balanced formula indeed...

While working this afternoon, another suggestion came to my mind: give a little bonus to the ones who have the best global accuracy...

For an example, in my case, i've bet $200, with a 65% accuracy... so i thought, why not add to your first formula a small bonus of (total amount of bets * total accuracy) / 2... here, it would be (200 * 0.65) / 2 = 65...

The good thing about that bonus is that it would incite people to do predictions on ALL games and consoles, and not do a single bet on one console or one game, and nothing at all for all the rest... if you try for the 10 games and the 5 consoles, and were globally correct, you are rewarded... what do you think about this, ioi?

But otherwise, your new formula is fair enough... even if i think most people won't bet very high on consoles sales in the future, because they'll be sure to loose or not win that much on these... 



 

"A beautiful drawing in 480i will stay beautiful forever...

and an ugly drawing in 1080p will stay ugly forever..."