Cobretti2 said:
I myself sure was pissed off that it was delayed. But that is because the Wii U has ports only so was desperate for a new game onthe system. After the dissapointment I do intend to get the game, bnot because it is 3rd party but if you played the demo it is actually a FUN well executed game that works with the touch pad very well. I also erge other Wii U users to get over it and get the game. After all most said I hope Ubisoft annoucenet some of the other big third party games like Watch Dgos and Splinter Cell. Indeed they have, so the way I see it they realise that there is a core Nintendo base that care about core games. It is time to let your wallets talk and not your mouths talk about buying Z Y OR Z and then not following through. Saying all this I do believe relationships between EA and Nintendo is screwed atm because why would EA praise the Wii U so much at E3 then go cold turkey? Just makes no sense to me. After all 3rd party games should be able to sell systems (like they do for Micrososft and Sony). But sadly we back to that original loop where Nintendo fans don't buy any of those games. |
the sad thing though, is if they dont buy rayman, and the sales are low, they would pretty much be justifying ubisofts delay of the game. i really understand how fans can be pist at ubisoft, but they are essentially the biggest 3rd party publisher that is backing up the WiiU, they should suck it up and buy their games if they like them so they can keep giving the WiiU more good games.
there is something definitely weird with EA/nintendo, but some people are just taking it way out of proportion IMO. wherever money is to be made EA has been there, so it wont just stop because of a stupid fued or failed bussines proposal, those happen all the time. the WiiU doesnt seem that interesting or that profitable (or at all profitable) for 3rd party games like battlefield, and thats the main reason its not releasing








