pezus said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
KungKras said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
Battlefield is the "me too" to CoD. It's the Sonic to Mario, the Rock Band to Guitar Hero. It's a big seller, but second fiddle in the war shooters category. It's a significant absence for Wii U, no question, but the titles the system needs are the ones I listed. If CoD is on Wii U and sells millions (not a couple 100k) then Battlefield will follow. It's tough for the also-rans on a Nintendo console. Consumers this fall will pick up Zelda, MarioU and MarioKartU. After that Watch_Dogs, AC4 and CoD will battle for interest. When the world's biggest shooter is relegated to 2nd level interest because of a flagship Mario, the second-place shooter becomes an afterthought. |
You have obviously never played Battlefield.
It's a PC shooter, leagues ahead of CoD in scale.
|
Didn't say it's not better. Or different. It's still a military shooter with less than half the sales of CoD. It is second fiddle. Rockband was better than Guitar Hero, many people liked Sonic better than Mario. Regardless, one is iconic with name value, one much less. Right now Wii U needs the name value titles to sell hardware. The others will follow if there is money to be made.
That said, I do think not having Battlefield is significant because it will be graphically of high quality on next gen titles. It's also one that easily could have been on Wii U if they wanted, unlike titles that were mostly done with PS360 in mind.
|
Not less than half, but more than half its sales. Not many other games can say that though, can they? 
|
Battlefield3 (2011): 12.97
CODMW3 (2011): 27.5
Battlefield = 47%, less than half.
But yes, it's a very big title!
