By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kaizar on 26 March 2013
Edit Thread
D-Minaj225 said:
Kaizar said:
D-Minaj225 said:

3D TVs have also sold more then HD TV for:

1st year sales

2nd year sales

3rd year sales

You get the idea.

i swear I'll never understand why 3D TV is so popular


Well, 3D TVs do 60 fps per image since 1930's but 3D TVs have been out since 1920's.

3D Movies have been recorded at 60 fps per camera since 1930's, but 2D is recorded in 24 fps to this date.

Plus 3D makes movies & shows look much more crisper looking then HD could ever do.

And 3D also makes graphics look much more crisper looking then HD graphics. (i.e. 3DS with 3D ON vs. 2D HD graphics on Wii U/PS4/720)

thanks for the info, i never knew that no wonder people complained about the The Hobbit's 48fps in 3D

Well at least they show the high frame rate version of the Hobbit, plus a lot of today's 3D movies are recorded in 24 fps, but they can make CGI Movies 60 fps including already formatted ones by re-rendering the CGI Movie.

But people are making Live Action 3D movies in 60 fps again, like Avatar 2. It's to get rid of the strobe effect in action sequences. But it also makes the non-action scenes look cheesy looking.

What I personally think they should do for Live-action 3D movies is record it in 24 fps, and then double the frame rate thru editing with the original 24 fps they got. (converting original Live-Action frame-rate to double the frame rate, like converting 24 fps to 48 fps......now if only someone would do it and pay me for the idea, LOL)