What is Market Domination?

[Sqrl]

kingofwale said:
1) Oh great. I get called "low-class" because you are unable to read properly? Read what you quote and read what I wrote, nowhere did I said "N64" and when you presss "Quote", you quote what was on there, and what was on there was "GC", not "N64". Although I do give you credit for trying to claim something as weak as this.
>Once the Dreamcast numbers are included it apparently lowers the PS2 to around 68% which by your definition is not domination.

2) Like I said before, PS2 is still selling in all regions, while xbox and GC are officially dead, in the end of PS2's lifetime, (in 2-3 years), it will gain over 70% of market share.

>. The console market is not the same kind of market as iTunes and eMusic, its not a retail market like Walmart & Target.

3) Did I say it's the same kind? I simply listed examples of what domination is outside of console wars? I didn't have to pick eMusic, I could've picked Napster, but Itune owns 83% of ALL online music downloads (not vs eMusic) and Walmart owns over 70% of all DVD downloads (not just vs Target).

1) First off, I read it perfectly fine. Second, if you click quote the text that ends up in your editor is whatever is in the database when you click not what was displayed on the page you were reading. So any edits made between loading the page and clicking quote would be added to the editor. I am reasonably certain it said N64 feel free to disagree but I think my credability is better than yours and I simply have no reason to lie about something so insignificant...as I said its a side point.

The low class comment was more to do with addressing the bit I crossed out which is definitely low class...if someone says something then corrects themselves it is extremely rude to jump on them for it after they've admitted it was a mistake. Fortunately that part you cannot deny. And ironically it turned out I was indeed correct...although for the wrong reasons.

2) As for the PS2 who cares what it will be at a year from now? What it has done right now is domination and any criteria that doesn't recognize that is folly if you ask me....or if you were to ask any reasonable person....

3) Yes, by comparing the two you are saying that it is a valid comparison and for them to be valid they have to be the same kind of markets. So either you don't think your examples are valid or you were saying they were the same kind of market...you can backpeddle on the issue if you like but thats the cold hard truth based on cold hard logic.