Gamespot scores Luigi's mansion 6.5

[theARTIST0017]

AndrewWK said:

theARTIST0017 said:

Wright said:

theARTIST0017 said:
FUCK GAMESPOT

No. Gamespot has really talented people and reviewers. Danny, for example (The one with the Escape from Mount Stupid videos and Random Encounter) is a quite brilliant individue. Kevin Van Ord is a great interviewer (although he's losing his touch when it comes to review). Gamespot is among the greatest videogame webpages available. The problem is, when they screw up, they screw up hard.

They're also quite known for being anti-nintendo for no damn good reason. go on sites like gamerankings or metacritics, look at top rated nintendo games and loom at their scores for nintendo games. LoZ: Twilight Princess for example.

They gave Twillight Princess an 8.8 and Skyword Sword a 7.5 which was far generous for that piece of garbage. They gave Spirit Track 8.5, Phanton Hourglass 9.0. Super MArio Galaxy 9.5, Super Mario Galaxy 10, New Super Mario Bros. 9.0, New Super Mario Bros. Wii 8.5

And now mr. Smart tell me how is this Anti Nintendo. Because they had the guts to say their opinion out loud?

are you patronizing me or are you using sarcasm? because my name isn't mr. smart thank you.

and I don't know if you live under a rock or just sleep all day because it's well know that gamespot generally is anti-nintendo in the sense that they score nintendo games that get high scores 1-2+ lower than the average.

Super Mario 3D Land which normally gets 9 got and 8 from Gamespot, Zelda Skyward Sword gets mostly 9-10 score and Gamespot gives it a 7.5, Star Fox 64 3D normally got like 8s and 8.5s, while Gamespot gave it a 7.5, and Legend of Zelda Ocarina of Time 3D got normally like 9-10 and Gamespot gave it an 8.5. Twilight Princess has a 95 average and got 8.8 from them. Let me tell you something, a 7 or 8 or 8.5 is scores different from a 9 or 9.5 or a 10. That is anti-Nintendo. Type into google search "why does gamesp"