Wright said:
a) It's too damn difficult, he bashes the game for it. If he can realize this fact, and say it in its review, then it is a fair, objective review. Far from perfect, but that's what it is. b) He has never played before and he thinks this is how games are. A totally inhumane learning curve, but that leads to progression and victory. He writes a review admitting he loved it because of the challenge. That's subjective too (Difficult should not mind in a review), but again; if he admits it, it is a fair review. |
But both reviews would point out the same thing. Wheter the reviewer bashes the game for being to difficult or praises it because of that doesn´t matter. You gotta decide for yourself if you like high difficulty or not. I know an objective review would be ideal but reviews are written by Human beings and it is impossible for a human being to be objective. And to be honest I´d rather read and honest review then one that tries to please the crowd.
But I mean overall I do agree with you. But until we get a standard rating system those problems will appear.
