By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. on 18 March 2013
Edit Thread
AbbathTheGrim said:
kain_kusanagi said:

AbbathTheGrim said:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=157110&page=6


Good grief. You have gone to great lengths to twist my words into other meanings.


That's how you take my previous post? Those quotes make it obvious you take contradictory stances. You could have addressed those quotes directly to demonstrate where they were twisted, but instead you decided to re-write your points and avoided discussing the quotes.

1. FF Vs 13 is NOT under contract by Sony. I believe it and all 3rd party games should be multiplatform.

You even put the "NOT" in capital letters, that really emphasis the fact right? But then when you were asked by brendude13 the following: "Who's to say Square Enix doesn't have a contract with Sony over Versus XIII?", you said:

Nobody. As far as anyone is aware there is no contract.

Not a single person inside this forum has the least amount of certainty of a single thing concerning this game. We don't even know if it still exist to the degree we could still refer to it as Vs13. You accepted that "nobody" can can tell for sure, and you have to accept that if Final Fantasy Vs XIII has a contract with Sony then there is no problem with that, judging by your reasoning which I am going to write about later on.

 

You dont need to argue with him about it. Sony is moneyhatting FFVersus to win over Japan and dead US buyers (as well as Assassins Creed) just like MS is moneyhatted Gears, Bioshock, Condemned, Mass Effect, COD and Destiny (and countless other timed exclusives earlier in the gen), plain and simple. Final Fantasy will make or break whether Microsoft cant catch up with Sony. If Japan responds correctly to Sony next gen Microsoft will need  as much of America as they can get to save their sales. It will close out the PS3 chapter unless they move it to next gen.