By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I want to know what people think market domination is?

 The PS2 'dominated' the market, and the X-Box, and GameCube, both had non-existant sales. The PS2 was the only viable conosle to buy, unless you were interested in the few Microsoft and nintendo Exclusives for those consoles.

Now in todays market, the Wii, is as a percent of hardware sales, the same distance ahead of the other consoles, however their sales are going up over time, not down. When the PS2 dominated, the GC, and XB, sales, kept shrinking and shrinking, and shrinking. That is not the case in this generation. Why is the Wii's "dominant" sales, not huring the PS3 and the 360's sales? Every console war in the past, the "dominant" console, has SMASHED the others. This time, it does not seem like the case, as the PS3/360 sales, are REALLY low compared to the Wii, but compared to the PS2, when it had 100% of the market, their really not that low. Now that brings me to my questions.

1. What is market domination?
2. What makes a conosle "dominant"
3. How do you distinguish diffrences. Like can you compare the DS, to the PS3?
4. How does the 'diffrences' effect "domination".

 

I want serious responces, with full debates. Keep away from the flameing, and trolling. I actually want a constructive post for once. I want to know what people consider domination, and where do you draw the lines from one 'market' to another 'market'.

Thanks for being constructive. -Kwaad 



PSN ID: Kwaad


I fly this flag in victory!