Vinniegambini said:
JazzB1987 said:
Good to see that even judges can be totally dumb people.
Nintendo didnt develop anything they licenced Sharp technology NINTENDO CAN NOT be accused of stealing or patent infrigment or anything like that in this case. The only company that can be sued here would be Sharp.
I mean you invent something I invent something similar and a third person buys from me how can You go and sue the third person? It makes no sense.
I wonder what the requirements for becoming a judge etc are do they accept mentally retarded people nowadays?
Thank god Nintendo wont need to pay this because a smarter judge will change the result of this crap.
P.S. thread name = there you have the reason why people always say Sony fans are the worst. Its not objective its just pure trolling well done :) |
The jury passed the judgement - common people like you and me.
Nintendo will appeal - the guy has no case.
|
So it was in the states then? Didn't bother to remember where that happened. My bad.
I bet all of the jury people play Playstation at home ;) Seriously this system seems so flawed when they dont even use a polygraph to find out wheter or not people are biased. Add a polygraph test and other tests etc. and then this system would be flawless.
