By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
outlawauron said:
Michael-5 said:
 

Also regardless, DS is more reliable then PS2, so if your critisizing PS2 being the hardware king, but questioning how many were replacement copies, I bet there are already more unique DS owners then PS2.

Considering that DS, DSLite, DSi, and DSXL are all coutned in the same figure, I'd wager you're wrong on this one. Nearly everyone I know who had a DS has bought at least one of the revisions (some all 4!).

Of course, there's no way to scientifically measure this, but both had quite a bit to flush the numbers.

Yeah quite possible  but my  reasoning was more like  how many people bought a system because they wanted to  instead of being "forced" to because their old one died.  So in this example I think DS is the winner.

I mean if people are happy with their system its their right to buy it twice  and that doesnt "manipulate" the sales or something. Whereas buying a system multiple times because the old ones keep  breaking somewhat does.

The best way would be if every company would be forced to reveal failure rates. So for every console that died you lose 1 "sale"(manufacturing faults only e.g.  crappy laser, cheap solder etc.)  would be interesting to see where the PS2 and 360 would be now.  But doing this would need some seperate sales chart we cant just remove normal sales  lol