|
pokoko said: Slower hardware progress does imply longer lifecycle, because it will be longer before the possible enhancements of a new console would be worth the generation transition. Strategically, Sony will not want a $99 PS3 undercutting a $400 PS4, even if it was economical to do so. The former's game library, established online, continued third party releases, and good-enough graphics would keep it too competitive to be worth it. I don't know when a 22nm shrink would be viable, but it will remain a large investment ($100m+) for at least 2-3 years. Sony would have to positively decide to do it. I don't think it makes sense to do. I believe Sony and MS will own their designs themselves and just pay AMD royalties. AMD is in a terrible financial position, shedding employees, and has no incentive to be doing any design work to help out Sony/MS unless paid additional hundreds of millions of dollars. AMD don't do manufacturing any more, they sold that off a few years ago. After paying for the shrink design work, MS/Sony would need to pay billions of dollars to accelerate the node timetable at TSMC, GF or Samsung. |







