| morenoingrato said: "Changing core aspects." "The overall game." You are SO blinded by your hate and pride that you are making up arguments and reading between the lines. You know what? Screw that. Your opinion is the least valid of the thread. You make up stuff and speak about things you have no knowledge of just to prove your points no one can get. That's just sad. Some people can't get the way others look at art. Some people prefer modern art over Da Vinci. Some people like Bob Marley more than Mozart. Are those people stupid? That seems to be your conception when it comes to gaming. |
When, in that thread, did I ever say it had to be core aspects of the game?
But I'll again indulge you. A core aspect of mario is that it is a World, and in a world properties can change (like they did in SMB3, where you had an ice level). Where is that core aspect of 2D mario nowadays, I wonder? There is barely anything new, it's all following a tried and true formula, which is no-good for many who were there when the series started. I'm okay with that, as long as I can feel that Nintendo deliberately did that to focus its creative efforts on other franchises, but my concern is that they may not have that ability, and need to work on it. Their fans just gobbling Nintendo's content regardless of that concerns me all the more.
Yes, I realize there's a facet of art which is subjective, I was criticising the blanket statement of "Art is subjective" so as to block people from discussing certain less subjective aspects of it, is all.
My points are as valid as their integrity and consistency. I think I've been logical, consistent and fair in this thread. Maybe a bit strict with you but that's it.
