By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
morenoingrato said:
happydolphin said:
RolStoppable said:
d21lewis said:
I only read the OP and I don't know what happened in the Gunman Clive thread. I just wanted to say (without creating a thread) that Tomb Raider is the best looking game I've ever played (I'm no PC gamer).

The gist of the Gunman Clive thread is that happydolphin praised that game, moreno called him out for his usual spitting ritual on NSMB, happydolphin said that moreno should consider for a moment that he (happydolphin) was in a better position to judge (after moreno admitted that presentation was a gimmick in his eyes), Rol called happydolphin a snob.

You only have eyes for Lara, so I don't think you are in a position to judge the game's overall graphics fairly.

Fixed.

I'm starting to question your observation skills.

I CLEARLY said I didn't care about that in a NSMB game, but it's really important in Tomb Raider or Zelda. This is just handpicking from your part.

This just makes your judgement even less valid.

No, you're just playing by both sides of your mouth. I do remember you saying that, but just a few posts prior you blatantly called presentation a gimmick, irrespective of the game it's discussed on.

VERBATIM (1st post, prior to the zelda one which is in light of this just pure bs):

"No, I do not believe that. Nintendo games are flawed, but changing core aspects and adding gimmicks that would detract from the overall game is a preposterous proposal."

It's done, you said it, that's what it is. And I'm sorry, but saying that I reserve the right to consider my opinion more valid that yours in that respect. Maybe if we're talking about Zelda I might lax up, but this was a general post, a general principle (e.g. do not sacrifice gameplay at the cost of presentation, which is a gimmick).