The PS3 is not the PS2

[staticneuron]

As far as format is concerned DVD was eventually used for games and no one complained. The DC did fine with thier GD roms and yet somehow no one had to mention whether or not DVD's would have been a benefit for devs. What is happening this generation is gamers dictacting what devs should and shouldn't do. And that they do not need so much space. And then people call sony arrogant. Timing and competition? Either the DC was competition or it wasn't. The sales died off after the PS2's release and Dev support waned. Does it matter this generation? Nope. The #60 and the PS3 seem to be geared for a similar position this time around. Both systems will get love by third party devs but in the end it will be fans that determine which console will have the most support. And as far as game titles are concerned the PS3 already has a pretty awesome lineup and quite a few exclusives that there are scant details on. The PS3 is not hurting for support and is going to get very compelling titles from now untill well into 2008. None of the games listed were really labled as exclusives before ( I think I have mentioned this before) and quite a few 360 supposed exclusives went multiplatform as well. That would put them on level playing ground and leave it to successful franchises to battle it out. If it was up to internal devs then sony would win that battle hands down. The previous success of the PS line has enabled its lineup to look as good as it does which means the PS3 garnered support before it hit the ground. Without even proving itself gamess that needs years of development were on thier way and here we come to today. http://ps3.ign.com/index/release.html Just in case anyone is curious at the amount of titles announced for the PS3.