JayWood2010 said:
crissindahouse said:
crazy that some people are like "haha if they nuke us or fight against us and we would nuke or invade them they wouldn't be there anymore'
do people realize that just because one country would win the probably very short war, there are still only two losers then? america wouldn't win anything, they would just lose less and would probably have the same if not more dead in their country if a nuke would really hit los angeles or something which won't be really the case but even if it's a short war with a few thousand dead american soldiers you already lost. the nuke on los angeles is just a theoretical example.
|
The thing is if they shoot a nuke we should be able to intercept it while it is over the ocean. They dont have the technology to intercept something that we shoot
|
that's why i said in theory, since other people on the internet say that north korea would lose so badly if a nuke would hit the usa. but like i also said, even if you invade north korea and "only" lose some thousand soldiers we only have losers, one is just the bigger loser but the other country didn't win anything except the certainty that you won't lose even more people. with or without nukes involved in such a war.
sometimes people sound like "yeah we are so powerful they shall try and we give them what they deserve, who cares that this also much worse for us as if we have no war"
