Kyuu said:
Wright said:
Kyuu said:
X360 had an entire year headstart and cost less so what did you expect? MS was too desperate that they released an incomplete X360 (No wifi, no HDMI out, no mandatory HDD) just to compete. And let's not speak about the embarrassing failure rate at the first few years.
|
But isn't that double-edged? Sony released an overprice console that were supossed to sell based only on the name. It was not until some price cuts and additions when they started winning market share. Both parts did horrible when releasing their consoles.
|
The PS3 never added/removed anything important. It cost much because it had a built in BluRay drive. And they were selling at great losses so you should be grateful.
|
Backwards compatibility and number of USB ports is not important? Did you just seriously write that?
It would also be nice if companies game out t-shirts to individuals obsessing over what place their console of choice showed up in the end as far as sales. This way, they would get something of value for their useless harping and obsessing.