Mnementh said:
oniyide said:
Mnementh said:
BasilZero said:
Mnementh said:
Yes, sure, consumers are to blame not to buy subpar-games. How bad of Nintendo-fans. And Just Dance was really a first-party-title that Nintendo gave to Ubisoft to publish. No way that a third-party ever adapts to the needs of the customer-base of a console. 
|
Either my sarcasm meter is broken or you dont know that Just Dance was a third party title...
|
LOL, your sarcasm-meter is broken.
I'm tired of people claiming the "Nintendo-dronez never buy teh third-partiez", while this claim is obviously untrue. The 3rd-parties only need to adapt to the audience.
|
funny thing is thats exactly what third parties did for the Wii but people complained that they were not get "any" third party support. ANd people did buy those 3rd party games it just wasnt the games some wanted.
|
Yes, agreed. My example of Just Dance is exactly that: a game that catered to the audience. But it is not common, as you look at the software-charts you see, that Nintendo far more often gets the audience on their platform than 3rd-parties. So many companies could have made much more money, as Ubisoft did.
|
Id argue that it was very common. Carnival games, game party, Zumba, Mel B fitness, biggest loser, there are more games on Wii than either PS3 or 360, no way Ninty made up the difference, problem is there some that would consider some of these games "shovelware"
