Trunkin said:
bananaking21 said:
Trunkin said:
bananaking21 said:
Trunkin said:
No, because the last AC game I played was the first one. I liked it, but by the time I catch up on the series, AC6 will be out.
Bloody yearly releases. |
my advice, just play the second one, its worth it. the rest, well, you can easily ignore them
|
I would, but what about the plot? I was under the impression that all of the games would progress the overarching storyline somewhat. Should I just Youtube it?
|
for the love of god dont. see in 2 this whole overarching story line is just ridiculous, plain and simple ridiculous. its not interesting, its not logical and its extremely stupid. the story of desmond miles is one of the reasons why every AC game after 2 is lacking in quality. if you will be interested in its story you will be interested in ezio's story, which after brotherhood (the one after 2) has a fulfilling ending. AC revelations adds pretty much nothing to ezio's or desmonds story.
|
Oh man. That's actually kind of...crushing to hear. I was looking forward to seeing how his storyline progressed. How about the multiplayer in Brotherhood(and 3?). Is it any good?
|
the multiplayer in brotherhood is actually pretty fun, but it does have a game breaking flaw. see your either an assassin or target, if the target catches the assassin off gaurd or the assassin makes a mistake you can "stun" him. but more than once when i was playing as an assassin if the target stunned me, he would stay next to me, then stun me as i am getting up, and the whole game would go that way. it happened to me more than once actually. its a flaw that was fixed in AC3 (didnt play AC :R multi) but i just wasnt interested in AC3 multiplayer for some reason
and mark my words, desmonds story is the worst in the history of video games.
