People who say that any system will make a comeback because of it's hardware: What history are you basing this on? Do you realize that not once in the history of gaming has the most powerful system/system with the best graphics won the system war. Not once. In fact, the PSone and the PS2 were both the weakest in their generations. I can't believe how often I see that ridiculous "the better hardware will win" argument. HD penetration or not, I'm almost positive that the outcome of this generation has already been determined. It will be Wii, Xbox 360, PS3. The only thing that hasn't been determined is if the PS3 will even survive the next 5 or 6 years to the end of the generation. And, for the record, it won't be Nintendo that gives up on their console first to start the 8th generation. The fate of the PS3 (to die or just rest with bad/mediocre sales at last place) will be determined by their willingness to cut the price and soon. I'm sorry but it's time to admit that a big mistake has been made and chop the price off before it's too late. I don't hate the PS3, and I don't want it to die, but looking at video game history: it's a very scary situation for Sony. I know that they can still pull out of this but they need to do it soon. Their sales aren't much better than the Saturn's sales (which hit their first cap about about 5.5-6 million, around where the PS3 will be this year). So, in answer to your first question. No, nothing will help the PS3 but a price cut of at least 100 bucks, probably 200.
