famousringo said:
No, it really wouldn't. The Wii would still be obviously inferior in polygon count, texture detail, shader effects, lighting, and anti-aliasing. The Wii is doing just fine on its own strengths. It doesn't need HD, or the costs associated with it. Just accept that the Wii isn't about graphics. I'd much rather have better artistic design than more pixels. |
Actually yes it would. The stuff 3rd parties put on the wii is 5% at most the wiis power. When there is Hd involved developers get more involved in the graphics and would use more of the wii. This means the wii would be better looking and people wouldn't say its last gen because the games would look better than anything on a last gen system. I am accepting the wii isn't about graphics. I accepted ever since I heard about the wii. The thing I'm not accepting is people saying gameplay over graphics=graphics don't matter at all. Gameplay over graphics= gameplay is more important than graphics but graphics still count too.







