By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
famousringo said:
sc94597 said:
Sky Render said:
I honestly don't care if they do make games with 720i/p or 1080i/p for Wii. Indeed, I'd prefer they not go HD. Higher quality graphics always come at the expense of other parts of the budget, such as gameplay development. As graphics are just there to enhance the experience the gameplay provides, if the graphics are the main selling point, what does that say about the gameplay?

I agree but that would stop people from complaing abouthow the graphics suck on the wii. It would also show developers that the wii is more than a gamecube 2.0 and deserves graphics better than ps2. It would be a little nice to have hd too. Just the extra detail making it look nicer.


No, it really wouldn't. The Wii would still be obviously inferior in polygon count, texture detail, shader effects, lighting, and anti-aliasing. The Wii is doing just fine on its own strengths. It doesn't need HD, or the costs associated with it. Just accept that the Wii isn't about graphics. I'd much rather have better artistic design than more pixels.


 Actually yes it would. The stuff 3rd parties put on the wii is 5% at most the wiis power. When there is Hd involved developers get more involved in the graphics and would use more of the wii. This means the wii would be better looking and people wouldn't say its last gen because the games would look better than anything on a last gen system.  I am accepting the wii isn't about graphics. I accepted ever since I heard about the wii. The thing I'm not accepting is people saying gameplay over graphics=graphics don't matter at all. Gameplay over graphics= gameplay is more important than graphics but graphics still count too.