Fayceless said:
JoeTheBro said:
People have bad memory. They think back to the best of the PS2 and compare it to the best of today when considering how big the leap was. Well let's look back at the best PS2 game's graphics.
Now look at Call of Duty 3
Basically it's in HD. Apart from more pixels and more vertices it isn't that much better. In fact GOW 2 can be argued to actually look better if COD is scaled to the same resolution.
That's a really small jump!
Now with PS4 we don't have as large of a pixel jump but we actually have a larger graphics jump.
That's actually a huge jump! It's a bigger jump than PS2 to PS3.
|
Do you people not understand the flaw of this post?
He takes a late 6th gen game, compares it to an early 7th gen game, claims there is little difference, then compares the early 7th gen game to an early 8th gen game and claims the difference is huge! Look at early PS2 titles (they ugly) and compare them to early PS3 games if you want a more accurate comparison.
If you compare recent eye candy like Uncharted 3 to our early pictures of PS4 games, it's not that impressive, much like GOW2 to COD3. It takes time for developers to tap into the full potential of the consoles.
|
Oh right cause Killzone 3 is an early 7th gen game. My bad everybody.
Snesboy said:
JoeTheBro said:
Michael-5 said:
From Wii to Wii U, the jump is bigger then last gen. Wii games look slightly better then Gamecube Games, and Wii U games, so far, comparable to PS4 games.
|
Read your whole post but that completely ruins everything else you have to say. Nothing on Wii U is even comparable to Knack.
|
Yeah right. Knack looks like the Wonderful 101. Or Project P-100. Whatever it's called. Don't be biased.
|
Yeah if we compare art styles they are kind of similar, that is true. And why would you think I'm biased? Since souping up my avatar and sig to solid PS4 stuff everyone seems to have forgotten I like Nintendo too.
