Paying for online gaming, THE OUTRAGE!

[adriane23]

kain_kusanagi said:

Solid-Stark said:
I suppose you have a point. But it's merely subjective.

For example, I will use myself. PS3, Steam, and Nintendo networks are my choice because they are free. Also, what I would pay for an Xbox only would grant me 4GB of storage which wouldn't be enough for some game's multiplayer components. Finally, with the limited exclusives that interest me, I wouldn't pay to play.

There. You see? Many choices and preferences exist.

Yep. We agree. Enjoying what we want doesn't offend the other. This thread isn't about people like us. It's about people who are offended that others pay for something they claim not to want and feel the need to spit fire over it.

Google is so convenient for calling out bullshit.

kain_kusanagi (on 23 June 2010)

No thank you. I'm not going to pay to let Sony tell me what games I can have for "free".

kain_kusanagi (on 25 June 2010)

Hulu should be free. It's free on the internet. Why would I pay for TV when I already pay for TV? Playstation Plus is so stupid. If you're not paying for playing online then there is no reason to pay. I'm not going to give Sony money for the privilege of letting them hand pick games I can use while I subscribe but never own.

kain_kusanagi on 29 January 2013

I honestly don't understand why so many Sony fans are so in love with PS +. You pay for Sony to pick games for you. What if you don't want those games? If you do you like the games you have to keep paying or you'll lose it. The sales are fine, but again you're paying Sony to choose what to discount for you. It's more like a rental system, but you only get to rent what Sony picks out from it's basket of stuff they that has already paid for itself or isn't selling.