I don't understand how anyone could ever trust MS's Next after this gen :/

[forevercloud3000]

easyrider said:

forevercloud3000 said:

easyrider said:

forevercloud3000 said:

JayWood2010 said:

learn that people have preferences and opinions and stop shoving yours down others throats. Goodnight

I RECOMMEND PEOPLE NOT COMMENTING IN THIS THREAD AND LET IT DIE.  DONT FEED PEOPLE WHEN THEY MAKE THESE TYPE OF THREADS.  YOUR NOT GOING TO CHANGE HIS OPINION AND ALL THIS THREAD IS GOING TO BE IS ARGUEING AND HIM DEFENDING HIS REASONS.

What are you talking about? You are basically going LALALA to these glaring issues that I have pointed out. I just would like to know how something like this is so easily dissmissed when so many other companies get blasted for far less.

ps2 was just as flawed but with out social media and also without a extended warranty. MS did everything right but you seem to have forgot ps2, so why should we be mad about this if it was handled way better.

8% vs 40%+

PS2 was no where near as bad and you are dilusional if you think so. Online gaming wasn't even a thing really yet when PS2 came out. The general console gaming public still wasn't even sure if it was something they wanted yet. 

Your using a % from later years. 360 is not at 40% anymore either and if you looked at it today it would be about the same as the ps2.

Im not saying RROD is still an issue(for anyone with the new consoles that is, which almost all 360 owners bought to evade more RROD). Yet it was an issue that should have never existed. That is a huge percentage of hardware failure that is honestly shameful. It could have been entirely evaded according to MS engineers but MS chose to ignore the issue in hopes of b esting Sony. Its not like I'm making this up or twisting it, that is what happened.