Turkish said:
happydolphin said:
Turkish said:
happydolphin said:
Turkish said:
It doesn't matter what other type of camera existed before the Eyetoy or the GC GBA connectivity. The idea behind Kinect is the same as Eyetoy, you don't have to tell me how much more advanced Kinect is, the idea and concept are the same. The motion peripherals of the 90s were novelties that never became a success. Eyetoy was the first to be successful and found an audience with the casuals.
Could you stream your GC game to your GBA like with the PS3 and Vita? No. Its funny how Nintendo fans claim Sony stole the idea from WiiU, neglecting the fact it was done way earlier.
|
Your double-standards are flaring. Could the Eyetoy perceive depth? NO.
|
Get this: the Kinect could be 4D in 4K with 120fps, it still doesn't change the fact that the concept of that style of gaming originated from the Eyetoy. Even the games reflect this, minigames, fitnessgames have all existed on it.
|
My God, I agree with you. And that's your double-standard, that though this in fact applies to the eye-toy, look at your reasoning against the GBA (IN BOLD)?
Do you think at all, like at all?
|
Stop being so vague and get to the point, are you saying you could play GC games on the GBA?
|
No, I'm saying that your argument against the Kinect is the same as your argument against the Vita-PS4 connectivity (both in bold now).
It's called a double-standard.
