By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
michael_stutzer on 20 February 2013
Edit Thread
Kaizar said:
michael_stutzer said:

It is OK if you post this crap in Nintendo threads, but don't post them everywhere please. 

Or just post it anyway, it is really fun to read it. 


It's a mix-match in specs, the Vita has more polygons but the 3DS has more shader cores.

And the 3DS downloads over 300 MB of videos in 4 or 5 minutes using Wireless B & G. So they both got 1 GHz CPU with the Vita having 2 more cores then the 3DS, but it's really the GPU making most of the graphics quality in games.

But you can just read from the 3rd Parties themselves:

http://nintendo3dsblog.com/castlevania-mirror-of-fate-could-have-come-to-the-vita-but-didnt-because-of-3d/

Even they don't know what makes it look better.

Plenty of people tried to tell you the differences in architecture between them and you still post the 1GHz CPU thing over and over. I won't give you a detailed explanation but just a few keywords to start: ARM 11 vs ARM Cortext A9. That should keep you busy for the rest of the day till the PS4 event haha.

Looking forward to your analysis of why the Wii U is actually more powerful than PS4.