By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aielyn said:
Dr.Grass said:
How about this; You're the only one oblivious to the pertinent ridiculousness of the article. It's not that I don't have time, it's just that I don't want to waste it on you. YOU wouldn't appreciate proper arguments.


And I can say that unequivocally, since you clearly can't spot a flaming turd when it's right in your face. The article is a piece of shit - deal with it..

Ad hominem, Argumentum ad populum, and Appeal to Ridicule. You're on a roll. To be honest, I'm surprised that you haven't evoked the Psychogenetic Fallacy, yet.


What on earth are you attempting to do here!?

Ad hominem: NO ARGUMENT was made by you, hence Ad hominem CANNOT APPLY.

Argumentum ad populum: The lowest common denominator here is common sense. Something that seems to be in short supply for a person groping at such lofty terms.

Appeal to Ridicule: Yes, that's exactly what I am doing. The article is ridiculous.

You think you're better in logic than me because you know a few terms? And you think that classifying a statement into one of these broad categories IMPLIES ANYTHING AT ALL about whether or not the statement holds logically!?