By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dr.Grass on 18 February 2013
Edit Thread
Aielyn said:
Dr.Grass said:
Like he said:


AnthonyW86 said:
Man the arguments in that article are so stupid it's beyond imagination, i could counter every of his arguments with atleast 5 of my own(...)

- 3 seconds typing 1 sentance vs 15 mins of arguing properly... Yeah, ok.

- And I do speed reading. It takes me a minute to read about 900 words.

Some pieces of writing are self-evidently trash. I don't feel the need to adress such obviously faulty 'arguments'. Also, you need a stronger word than errancy to describe the brainless hogwash that is the article in question.

Wow, you certainly don't seem to lack enough time to respond to people. And for the record, if it was so obviously faulty, it would take you very little time to put forward one clear-cut and undoubtable example of a fault. It shouldn't take 15 minutes of detailed arguments.

How about this; You're the only one oblivious to the pertinent ridiculousness of the article. It's not that I don't have time, it's just that I don't want to waste it on you. YOU wouldn't appreciate proper arguments.


And I can say that unequivocally, since you clearly can't spot a flaming turd when it's right in your face. The article is a piece of shit - deal with it.