| Dr.Grass said: Like he said:
- 3 seconds typing 1 sentance vs 15 mins of arguing properly... Yeah, ok. - And I do speed reading. It takes me a minute to read about 900 words. Some pieces of writing are self-evidently trash. I don't feel the need to adress such obviously faulty 'arguments'. Also, you need a stronger word than errancy to describe the brainless hogwash that is the article in question. |
Wow, you certainly don't seem to lack enough time to respond to people. And for the record, if it was so obviously faulty, it would take you very little time to put forward one clear-cut and undoubtable example of a fault. It shouldn't take 15 minutes of detailed arguments.







