By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dr.Grass said:
Like he said:


AnthonyW86 said:
Man the arguments in that article are so stupid it's beyond imagination, i could counter every of his arguments with atleast 5 of my own(...)

- 3 seconds typing 1 sentance vs 15 mins of arguing properly... Yeah, ok.

- And I do speed reading. It takes me a minute to read about 900 words.

Some pieces of writing are self-evidently trash. I don't feel the need to adress such obviously faulty 'arguments'. Also, you need a stronger word than errancy to describe the brainless hogwash that is the article in question.

Wow, you certainly don't seem to lack enough time to respond to people. And for the record, if it was so obviously faulty, it would take you very little time to put forward one clear-cut and undoubtable example of a fault. It shouldn't take 15 minutes of detailed arguments.