Dr.Grass on 18 February 2013
Aielyn said:
And yet, you're happy to waste time saying so, not to mention reading through the blog post in the first place and asserting its errancy. |
Like he said:
AnthonyW86 said:
Man the arguments in that article are so stupid it's beyond imagination, i could counter every of his arguments with atleast 5 of my own(...)
- 3 seconds typing 1 sentance vs 15 mins of arguing properly... Yeah, ok.
- And I do speed reading. It takes me a minute to read about 900 words.
Some pieces of writing are self-evidently trash. I don't feel the need to adress such obviously faulty 'arguments'. Also, you need a stronger word than errancy to describe the brainless hogwash that is the article in question.
