By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

In a now-locked thread related to this subject, I said:

famousringo said:

Interesting. Goes to show the delay happened to protect sales of the software on PS3 and 360, and not because of any production problems. Does anybody out there still believe the big publishers don't have it in for Nintendo?

To which Rol replied:

RolStoppable said:

Sure, plenty of people still believe that the big publishers always make logical decisions when it comes to Nintendo. And if they are confronted with instances of blatant stupidity or spitefulness on the publisher's part, they can always fall back on: "They are businessmen, we are not. They know better than us. There is no bias against Nintendo."

And so now I respond, awkwardly, in this unlocked thread:

The conclusion is simple. Killing Nintendo must be good for business.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.