haxxiy said:
Anyways I don't know why you even quoted him - it's not like your post offer any relevant insight on his consideration of financial matters. |
His reasoning for apple being able to 'destroy' things is based on apple having '130 billion in the bank and no debt". I mearly provided examples where the company with '130 billion in the bank and no debt' failed to destroy.
Having a bunch of cash in hand doesn't mean you can casually jump into a random market. Why doesn't apple go into oil exporting, with 130 billion in the bank and no debt they can no doubt destroy 'exxon business in the blink of an eye'. .. ehm.. no.







