Mr Khan said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Mr Khan said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
brendude13 said:
So...
...SONY didn't kill Sega! Microsoft did! 
|
No one killed Sega but themselves. Microsoft would only be buying a shell of a company. It's not like Rare when as soon as Microsoft purchased the company everyone of value just left.
|
Not true. From a financial perspective, Sega of 2001/2002 was shot, but they were still a very, very good development studio, and they retained their people for a while
The financial distress (and the fact that Sammy seems to hate them) has slowly starved out Sega of people and development capability ever since, but buying them in 2002 would've netted you a development/publishing powerhouse
|
I agree, but sega had been in distress since the late mid-late 90's based on decisions they made, which caused them to tank as a platform company after the Dreamcast. Thats almost two decades of issues. I don't really see where we're disagreeing here.
|
My bad, i thought by "shell of a company" you meant that Sega's development talent had already gone.
|
I was focused on Segas sales potential. Microsoft is looking for games that can exclusively sell over 3 million copies or more exclusive to their platform. When I say a "shell of a company" in reference to Rare I was talking about the Stamper Bros taking the money and running, and their star staff moving onto Radical Games which, course is now owned by Crytek. Look at Liohead, that company is now a shell of its former self because Molyneux left and his star staff formed their own company.
