dsgrue3 said:
You admit there isn't any evidence and then proceed to attempt to rationalize why there is no evidence. This is really odd to read. I don't pretend to know how the Universe came to be, but I know the best possible scientific explanation for humans - look into abiogenesis and phylogeny. It certainly does not require a Creator. Yes atheism is disbelief in God. Disbelief in his existence, that isn't remotely the same as denying existence of God. I wouldn't do that, nor would any rational person. I would never say God doesn't exist, I will always say I do not belief he exists. PS: Can you stop replying within the quotation? |
I said theres no evidence in the way Atheists demand it to be.And it probably never will be. Just as theres never going to be any evidence to support otherwise I can say that in my spiritual life and development I've encounterd tons of evidence for God. But this evidence would hold no ground on discussions such as this, so I dont present it as an actual evidence because its from my personal experience and it would be meaningless to a 2nd party . You'd have to believe to understand it.
Im somewhat fimiliar with Abiogenesis and phylogeny. But these have nothing to do with the Creation of Universe (which triggered everything in its existance and thus ultimately led to these 2 things), but with evolution of species on our planet, which i fully accept and recognize. I dont see how does that in anyway contradict or disprove a Creator, care to explain ? Why cant biology and nature be God's work too?
By not believing in God, you deny his existance, maybe not on an objective level, but on subjective







