Mr Khan said:
ninjablade said:
Mr Khan said:
Bruxel said:
i really doubut bayonetta would end up multi platform as it is funded by nintendo. |
Right. Imagine if you paid to have something made, and then the makers took it and used it to enriched your competitors. Nintendo's legal ninjas can't possibly be stupid enough to allow such a thing to come to pass. Especially since they came to Platinum Games when the incomplete game was headed for the rubbish bin, Nintendo probably had tremendous leverage in naming the terms of the partnership, and so even if Nintendo wasn't mean enough to get exploitative (which they very well could be, who knows), they would have made the exclusivity clause airtight.
|
remember microsoft paying 50 million dollar for GTA 4 exclusive eposidic content, but 1 or 2 years after it was released on ps3, sure nintendo saved the game from going to the rubbish but how much did nintendo pay? they might have payed only for a 1 year exclusive deal, we will never know because its under NDA. i just don't think nintendo will pay platinum games 2 million worth of sales, that would be a horrible descision for nintendo because both games are not system sellers.
|
Microsoft paid for its exclusivity, not for it to be produced period. Gay Tony/Lost and Damned would still have come into existence without Microsoft's seed money. Bayonetta 2 would not exist without Nintendo's intervention.
|
still point remains rockstar made that content with microsoft money and released on ps3. we don't really know the exact deal with baynoitta, maybe nintendo gave them enough funds to finish the game for a 1 year exclusive deal, then later be released on 360/ps3. i think that makes more sense for both parties in deal, nintendo, pays less money and platinum games gets more sales.
