Vertigo-X said:
bananaking21 said:
Cold-Flipper said:
I say definitely not
I read back when the Wii was first released in 2006 that Nintendo always wanted a screen in their controller. They apparently thought about it while making the GC's successor but found that it would be too expensive. They then discovered motion controls and the Wii was born.
In 2007 while thinking of what to do with the Wii's successor, they went back to the screen concept which is now more cost-efficient. Wii U is now born. Nintendo does this a lot actually. They think of ideas and don't use them because of cost issues and come back to it later. |
that could be it, i remember that was the case with 3D and the 3DS. but that kind off supports my point. they were looking at the screen in controller thing after the gamecube but went with motion controlls as it is the better idea. and now they went back with that old idea because they couldnt come up with anything else 
|
Lol, I know you winked at the end of your post, but that's not what he was saying at all. They went with it because it was more feasible at the time (apparently).
|
i added the wink for you not to think im trolling or arguing with you, just actually having a discussion 
i dont think it was more feasible at the time, i mean they did add the touch screen to the DS after all. i think they realized what they could do with motion controlls. and its apperant in the games. right off the bat the Wii had zelda and wii sports. both these games showed off what nintendo can do with the WiiMote. WiiU has nintendo land, from what i hear its good. but its no Wii sports. Wii sports was ground breaking when it came to showing off the gameplay potential of the Wii. but now people are still saying they are waiting for nintendo to come up with the game that blows them away and shows what the gamepad can do
