| iceland said: @J_Allard I completely agree, I've even pointed things like that out on N4G (you can probably guess what happened). The whole "it's on PC too! lol!!" is moot, it's still a MS platform by that same logic they shouldn't have counted PSASBR (like you said) or Sly TiT (an example I use). Of course companies want to maximize profits as much possible, what's wrong with that? And to that guy with the anti-MS sig, re-read the title/article no one said exclusive.... State of Decay is a great example that MS is willing to support creativity, every publisher wanted a WoW clone but MS supported their unique idea. Class4 sounds amazing, I assume it's going to be a NextXbox title? I also think Ryse isn't coming out this gen, thought it was confirmed to be moved to next gen. I was surprised they listed Ryse and not Skulls of the Shogun. Speaking of that.. Why do people still think XBLA titles shouldn't count? If anything has been proven this gen it's that downloadable games could be as deep as retail games. You guys (sony fans) raved over Journey but when you see downloadable titles on other systems it's "oh it's just an XBLA title" lol I don't understand. With that all said I'm only looking forward to SOD, maybe lococycle. And while I do agree that PS3 has a far better lineup I can't agree with the arguments people use. The fanboys are going to be outta control this year. |
I agree with everything you said but just wanted to point out somethings. Some people still consider exclusive in its purest term ie PSABR is not exclusive and neither is Gears of War. And Journey is OMG with sony fans because its gotten so many awards and GOTY and blah blah blah high scores, while any XBLA game has not. Walking dead is also talked about a lot.







