zero129 said:
Resident Evil 6 was made by Capcom right? hows that doing atm? bad right? and thats always been a bigger game then DMC, So could you imagine if they made DMC5 themselfs? it prop would of sucked big time unlike DmC wich is a great action game. And with DMC5 sucking so much (most likely would of happend with how RE6 turned out), It would of got crap reviews and with it being the end of the gen where lots of games are selling bad atm would of most likely sold in line with this game imo. |
And you know why people bitched about RE6? They have been straying farther and farther from survival horror since 3. 4 had a good balance. 5 had more action than horror. And according to what I've heard, RE6 went even further with action, even introducing regenerating health. Point is, you change a game to appeal more to casuals or the mainstream crowd, you abandon the core audience (the ones that have been making the franchise money from day one), and your sales will decline. So no, if they made a DMC5 in the same vein as the original DMCs, there sales wouldn't have been this poor.
I also find it ridiculous that all of the DmC supporters really have nothing to attack the DMC fans with except Dante's hair color. It just shows you really have no argument against them, and therefore must make the original fans out to be shallow gamers. As if NT could have still turned Dante into a scrawny emo (who's personality we hate), and made all those poor changes to the combat and controls, and we would have eaten it up as long as his hair was white. Also, to imply that no one gave the game a chance? It had a demo on Live and PSN, which is where ALL the complaints about gameplay/control and difficulty came from. AFTER people played the demo. DMC fans did give it a chance, didn't like it, so therefore voted with their wallets. And there most likely won't be a DmC sequel becuse of it. You just need to accept it and move on, without bashing those fans.
