Nintendo's unrealistic pricing for old-school platformers et al.

[NintendoPie]

happydolphin said:

This is what immortal actually said , that game sales don't indicate quality, but perceived value:

Immortal said:

Words we all tend to forget all too often.

Regardless, even if you don't want to acknowledge that quality is subjective, whoever was it that said that quality has anything to do with pricing? It has something to do with the value an average consumer sees in the product, but nothing whatsoever to do with "quality" as you or I or any other individual sees it.

Other than that, well, Wii sold the games, which sold more Wiis, fair enough. But then the failure of those game to sell 64s and cubes paints a different picture than what you're saying, that the games themselves are worthy of their sales. It would seem that if that were the case, they would have sold on either the 64/cube or the Wii. But they didn't.

What games are we talking about?

Nintendo's First Party games basically saved their older consoles. It sure wasn't any third parties.