By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kaizar said:
disolitude said:
Kaizar said:
disolitude said:
Speaking of 1080p TVs...

Fellow Canadians that need a good 1080p set for dirt cheap -
http://www.walmart.ca/en/ip/factory-refurbished-47-inch-lcd-1080p-120hz-with-pixel-plus-3-hd/10154806?


At WalMart, well you are more better off getting a Refurbish VIZIO Smart 3D HD TV 1080p 32 inch.........it cost $270 in the US.

I beg to differ. 3D on a 32 inch is next to useless especially considering it's passive 3D which sucks.

This TV has an IPS 178/178 degree viewing pannel and was one of the Phillips high end TVs in 2010.

I watch live action 3D videos all the time on a 3.53 inch screen (my 3DS) and its also Passive 3D.

So explain all those Movie Trailers & Music Videos & etc. in Passive 3D on a less then 4 inch screen.

 

Are you talking about Converting 2D to 3D like the Star Wars Episode 1 3D trailer that was on the 3DS?


Ive been gaming and watching 3D since 2009 and have discovered that the effect of 3d is lessend the smaller the screen is. My first 3D screen was a samsung 22 inch 1680x1050 3D vision monitor which i used on the pc and found meh. In late 2009 though I picked up a samsung 67 inch LED DLP 3D TV which is capable of full 1080p 3d and damn...that was much better.  Since I've had a 92 inch 3D projector which is the way 3D is meant to be experienced.

Another issue with that Vizio is the fact it uses polarized glasses which halves the resolution. You are already limited to 720p for gaming since thats the maximum res that HDMI ports can take at 60 frames per second, and then you half that due to polarized glasses. It looks like crap...

So yeah, all im saying is that while that Vizio is probably a good choice for a tv at that price, I would completely ignore the 3d aspect of I were to buy it as it really isnt up to snuff.