| timmah said: You're wrong. There are multiple beliefs on omniscience, not all of them include future http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omniscience Omniscience does not by definition have to include Anterograde omniscience (future). Also, the subject of time/perspective CAN BE part of the philophical discussion. You're taking an incredibly deep and nuanced discussion and whittling it down to one overly simplistic statement. As somebody who has actually read on and done some studying on this subject, I can tell you have not done your own due dilligence. |
Cool if you want to retard omniscience like you keep retarding god, go ahead. But future knowledge is no different than current or past knowledge given all variables and constraints at a given moment. As you said, God is out of time, can jump in at any place and analyze. I don't need to do any research, you've yet to acknowledge the simple truth that they are mutually exclusive given the accepted definitions for both.
If you want to deal with a retarded defintion of omniscience and a retarded god, then go away. (Note: Retard as in the transitive verb)
