By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
chris_wing on 01 February 2013
Edit Thread
badgenome said:
Mr Khan said:

Which is much better than the Wii U version currently.

The writing is clear as day that EA has worked to self-sabotage their Wii U offerings so that they can, henceforth, justify releasing 0 games on the platform.

I can only hope that heads roll in the EA boardroom because of this.

So they made their games bomb on purpose? How does that even make sense? If they don't want to make games for the Wii U, there is nothing to stop them from saying, "Fuck U, we're not making games for the Wii U."

I think the theory that people have is that they provide late (ME3, NFS) and gimped (Madden) games to create a set of sales data that they can show to investors to avoid any legal action by not supporting a console and potentialy loosing revenue.

Why would they want to not support a platform that could provide revenue?

1-A grudge against Nintendo for not going alone with Origin

2-To streamline the development process of current gen & next gen games by sticking to the market leaders, which could save more money then it could potentially bring in.