timmah said:
dsgrue3 said:
timmah said:
dsgrue3 said:
timmah said:
dsgrue3 said:
timmah said:
I disagree with that statement, because observation or non-observation does not fundamentally change the processes in my mind/soul that result in the decision, those processes are the same in either scenario (unless some greater force is 'pulling the strings', which I don't believe). I also don't think that a computer calculating my choice would nullify the choice, as the choice happens in my mind and is not influenced or caused by the calculation of the computer (as long as I did not know what the computer had calculated I would choose).
|
You disagree with a deterministic path? Uh...how? God knows each and every decision you make from birth until death. That's determinism, he knows, you don't. Suggesting it is nondeterministic is suggesting that god does not know your path which would negate omniscience.
|
|
Bump for response.
|
I already told you how and why multiple times, I'm not responding to this particular argument anymore because I've explained it to death. I'm done running in circles on this one. Your goal here is (as usual) to pigeonhole me into recognizing your shallow, black & white assesment of my belief so you can take me on the pre-designed logical train that you and all atheists use in an attempt to 'disprove' God, when you already acknowledge that you can't really disprove God. I'm not hopping on that train, so you can stop trying.
|
You never once answered this. You went off on a tangent about time which is completely irrelevant. Answer the question, if you can.
|
You just don't get the explanation. The 'tangent' about time and how it relates to perspective is my answer. I'm done.
|
So your argumen is that God can't see information in any other way other than your incredibly specific example? Got it.
