By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Demensha said:
The big difference for me is not graphics per say(while very important, Im playing DS2 for the 3rd time again cause its fun) but rather how I can use the system and with how many people. For example BF3 is an amazing game on the pc, he'll if the game was in full 1080p on Xbox and ps3 I would even say its close to pc level visuals,but that's not what it's about. If next gen systems are doing 64-128 person battles and wii u can only run 24-32 players max that may be a be factor in sales( talking about shooters only).

What I find funny is why is Nintendo critized for spending 100$+ per console for the tablet instead of better hardware, yet somehow nextbox will have kinect 2.0 and ps4 may have move built in or a tablet controller and somehow their costs aren't increased. Why not ? How can the other 2 make a console with extra controllers/peripherals and extreme advanced hardware and it only cost 350-400$? I think people are either dreaming about the next gen specs or the prices will be closer to 500$ my 2 cents.

I think it's mainly because they're much more willing to take a hit for each sold console... Sony lost $300/PS3 in the beginning... that's HUUUUGE!

And I agree; I don't care too much about graphics, just as long as the ports don't llok or run ugly/bad on Wii U



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.