By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kantor said:
Munkeh111 said:
Scoobes said:

Probably because AC2 was a brilliant game, superior in most ways to AC3 and a huge step up from AC1.

I totally agree that it wasn't as good as AC II and it was certainly disapointing, but once I got that out of my system, I thoroughly enjoyed it

Well, I guess I was enjoying it to some degree whilst I was playing it, though never nearly as much as I enjoyed AC2.

It's just looking back that I see how disappointing it really was.

I suppose it's still a high 7 to a low 8, but that puts it fourth in the series for me (behind II, Brotherhood and Revelations), and I was hoping it would be the best of the lot. This is what annualised releases do to a franchise


This and also Kantor your previous comment.

About 10 hours in now, the story is a COMPLETE mess. I have no idea what's going on half the time. AC2 will always be the best in the series, but was hoping they actually improved it with the 3rd interation. 



Currently own:

 

  • Ps4

 

Currently playing: Witcher 3, Walking Dead S1/2, GTA5, Dying Light, Tomb Raider Remaster, MGS Ground Zeros