By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
oni-link said:
ninjablade said:
CGI-Quality said:
ninjablade said:
Otakumegane said:
Uh oh. Ninjablade is back guys. ABANDON THREAD.

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=60501&page=174 read if you like, this is a board of techical experts and deveolpers, they confirm wiiu is not more powerful then currentgen, but what ever i'm biased because i use facts.

I have to wonder why you parade on this way...Why are you so threatened by this game? And, you have only given examples of people that seem to think the WiiU is a weaker system than current gen. Then are the developers who say otherwise, lying?

i'm out of this thread ill pm where most developers say its on par with current gen.

Forget it dude no one will believe your anti-Nintendo statements anymore!!!

what are my anti-nintendo statements exactly, predictions that the wiiu will fail in sales, which is what''s happening, saying RDR looks better techically then this game,  developers have said wii u is on par with current gen along with beyond3d which is the most trusted site for tech infromation that are only backed up by facts and not fanyboy specualtion, so everything is backed by facts, from the early build my main point was the lighting in RDR is more impressive, which now i can back up by facts, from techincal analysis we can see that lighting is mostly pre-baked and static, unlike RDR which is dynamic, we need to see more of X, proper gameplay footage in real HD quality and 720 Pics before i can say which looks better of sure, pluse like you said its still early, things can change for the better or the worst, by i mean by worst is even in a short edited trailer, they could not hide the techical flaws, this has happend many times this gen, where a trailer of a game get released everybody is saying how  it looks amazing techically, game comes out is sub hd, has terrible performace issues and other techical flaws.