KHlover said:
bananaking21 said:
KHlover said:
bananaking21 said:
KHlover said:
bananaking21 said:
it would be better suited with sony, not only does sony have the experience making these types of games, sony gives their devs more freedom to create the types of games they want |
Sony has more experience in Legend of Zelda-like games? I don't think so.
And if you meant the fighting system - I don't think the hack-n-slay part was that good in Darksiders I+II, nothing Nintendo couldn't do.
|
sony has more experience in games aimed at adults, hack in slash games. and its not about if nintendo could do it or not its about who would handle it better, and that would be sony. the game would fit in their portfolio of games much better than nintendo's
|
Oh, yeah. Let Sony have it then. IF they handle it well (did they handle ANY game well in the last 2 years though?) it will only lead to Nintendo putting even more effort into the Legend of Zelda->positive
|
eh i actually dont want sony to buy it lol, i dont like darksiders and think sony would be wasting their time on it when they can make a better game. but i was just saying sony would handle it better IMO.
@bolded thats a whole new other discussion and one that might (and probably) start a flame war because someone might think were bashing haha
|
Isn't it zhe consense her that Sony just plain sucks at marketing games?
|
They may suck at marketing games, but not making them.
